The Wright Firm, L.L.P.

When your family, finances, freedom or future are at stake, you need an attorney you can count on. The Wright Firm, L.L.P.


Posted on | January 27, 2011 | 1 Comment

The propriety of corporal punishment is an increasingly controversial subject.  An Iowa case points out that, “Not many years ago children were disciplined in homes and at school by spanking them with rulers, sticks, and belts, and that this type of discipline was not looked upon as child abuse. Rather, it was considered an acceptable form of discipline.” This method of discipline is on the decline.  While many critics of corporal punishment contend that the practice violates “children’s rights” it is still used in this country.  In fact, one study suggested that at least 90 percent of American parents have used corporal punishment at some time in rearing their children.

The fact that a child is spanked, on its own, does not evidence family violence. A parent generally has discretion to use some amount of corporal punishment. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. 151.001(e)(1) (West 2008) (parent may use corporal punishment for reasonable discipline of child), 151.003 (West 2008) (“A state agency may not adopt rules or policies or take any other action that violates the fundamental right and duty of a parent to direct the upbringing of the parent’s child.”). Therefore, for corporal punishment to constitute family violence there must be some evidence–such as severity of injury, type of instrument used, or mental or emotional state of the perpetrator–that would transcend a reasonable level of parental discretion regarding discipline. Clearly, there is a gray area in Texas law and much room for debate regarding what discipline is appropriate according to Texas law.

If you find yourself in a situation either criminally or in a civil case with Child Protective Services regarding the discipline of your child, give The Wright Firm, L.L.P. a call at 972-353-4600 or reach us via the web at



  1. Marcia Renee Wilmot
    November 1st, 2012 @ 2:31 pm

    It is illegel for the State to bring charges of Child abuse according The U.S. Constitution gives us the right to rear our children in accordance with our own beliefs, as well as the Crimianl Laws as the Texas Penal Code 6.91(a) The use of force, but not deadly force, against a child younger than 18 years is justified:
    (1) if the actor is the child’s parent or stepparent or
    is acting in loco parentis to the child; and
    (2) when and to the degree the actor reasonably
    believes the force is necessary to discipline the child or to
    safeguard or promote his welfare.
    (b) For purposes of this section, “in loco parentis”
    includes grandparent and guardian, any person acting by, through,
    or under the direction of a court with jurisdiction over the child,
    and anyone who has express or implied consent of the parent or

    Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974.
    Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, § 1.01, eff. Sept. 1,

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.